🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."